Noticed there is another thread discussing performance issues. There was a
question mentioned there about virus checkers. Turns out svn may be
interacting badly with the virus checker software on my machine (Trend
OfficeScan). Turning off the virus checker on my machine dropped the time
down to 30 seconds. Big improvement, but still slow, especially since TSVN
can do the same thing in 15 seconds.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Collins-Sussman [mailto:sussman@collab.net]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 3:01 PM
To: Rule, Chris
Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org; Geoff Krapf
Subject: Re: subversion and code peer reviews
On Jan 14, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Rule, Chris wrote:
>
> Unified diffs don't seem useful to me. We have gotton used to (spoiled
> by?)
> graphical difference programs. The one we actually like the best is
> gdiff on the SGI. I tend to use tkdiff and others in our group uses
> windiff.
> These
> tools allow you to see the context of the changes.
svn can use 3rd-party GUI diff programs too. See the --diff-cmd and
--diff3-cmd args. I'm sure TSVN allows this also.... just write a wrapper
script.
>
> I did try the "svn status" command where everything was on my local
> machine.
> It took 1 minute 45 seconds to execute. This is probably not going to
> be acceptable. However, the TortiseSVN Check for Modifications menu
> only took
> 15 seconds. I haven't tried this across the network yet though I will
> be.
>
> Machine details:
> 2.8 GHz P4
> 1 Gbyte RAM
> Windows XP
> Using svn:: for repository access.
>
What version of TSVN? The latest release (1.1.2) is much faster at status.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 14 22:26:25 2005