On Jan 14, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Jani Averbach wrote:
> On 2005-01-14 11:08-0800, Arlo Belshee wrote:
>
>> + Server: OS 10.3. Subversion v 1.0.2
>> + Client: Win XP, fast hardware, NTFS. 2 Subversion clients (similar
>> results with each): Tortoise, svn command-line client. Both are the
>> ones for
>> svn 1.0.2.
>> + Access via svn+ssh. Normally with key agents, but using manual
>> password
>> for timing (so I can tell allocate time to a finer granularity).
>> Total time
>> similar with keys and passwords.
>> + Clients run both virus scanner and firewall (standard corporate
>> config).
>
> Could you double check that your virus scanner isn't doing anything
> stupid? I have seen inferior results with over-eager scanners.
>
> If you could exclude .svn directories from scanning list that will
> help, if you could exclude your whole working directories that will
> the be best. If you have an exclude list for files: *.c, *.h and so
> on, that probably won't help because SVN is storing your files as
> <curr_dir>/.svn/text-base/*.c.svn-base so your scanner might scan also
> those files.
>
I'd also be curious to see what your timings look like using a 1.1.2
commandline client on a unix-y system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 14 21:12:39 2005