[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Performance Question

From: Dale Worley <dworley_at_pingtel.com>
Date: 2005-01-11 19:58:56 CET

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Collins-Sussman [mailto:sussman@collab.net]

If working copies were cheap, nobody would ever revert changes or
switch to a branch. They'd just make a new workspace appear.

Not so -- "svn revert" means "The change I made to this file is Not Good and
should be removed from the fix I am constructing", and "svn switch" means
"Transport these changes to be based on a different branch".

-----Original Message-----
From: Brass Tilde [mailto:brasstilde@insightbb.com]

That sounds an awful lot like you think svn should account for possible
deficiencies in the build system. Is that what you intended?

I do adjust how I *use* Subversion to account for possible (known)
deficiencies in the build system.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 11 20:01:12 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.