On Jan 10, 2005, at 4:28 PM, John Schulz wrote:
> Did you ever get your question answered? I've been keeping track on
> the svn list and haven't seen a concrete resolution. :-)
No, what you see below is all I got. Even if I was off by one, which I
don't think I am (someone please tell me), I think the merge should
have been clean for most cases.
Scott
> On Jan 01, 2005, at 23:46, Scott Palmer wrote:
>> On Jan 1, 2005, at 11:30 PM, Christopher Ness wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 23:12 -0500, Scott Palmer wrote:
>>>> I tried again with:
>>>>
>>>> svn -rB:HEAD svn://blah/trunk
>>>
>>> Off by one error? Did you try to merge the changes in revision B
>>> twice
>>> into your branch with the above command? Perhaps...
>>>
>>> svn -r{B+1}:HEAD svn://blah/trunk
>>
>> I thought about that. The merge is basically applying the diff
>> between the supplied revisions is it not? So -r1:2 would merge the
>> changes to go from rev 1 to rev 2, and -r2:3 would merge the changes
>> to go from rev 2 to rev 3. Right?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 10 22:39:26 2005