[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: looking for references on the evil that is VSS

From: Sean Laurent <sean_at_neuronfarm.com>
Date: 2005-01-07 00:26:31 CET

On Thursday 06 January 2005 05:02 pm, Peter A. Pociask wrote:
> >Microsoft does not use VSS for their own internal development.
> Is this true or just an urban legend? I have never been able to find a
> confirmation..


As of two years ago, Microsoft was not and had never used SourceSafe for
internal development. At that time, I worked with several engineers who had
been part of the Windows 95 development group. They stated that during the
Win95 development cycle they utilized a tool known as "slime" (aka SLM -
Source Library Management), which appeared to be a crappy version of CVS with
limited or non-existant branching/tagging support.

I found a link where someone else supports this. Several people also mention
that more recently Microsoft has used SourceDepot, a derivation of Perforce:


It is easier to get forgiveness than permission.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 7 00:28:55 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.