[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Copying commited WC

From: Steve Greenland <steveg_at_lsli.com>
Date: 2005-01-05 18:45:06 CET

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:16:28PM -0500, Scott Palmer wrote:
> Technically I suppose the status command could update the base revision
> if it detected no changes in the repository for unmodified files in the
> WC. Right? (I'm asking someone how knows - I'm ignorantly speculating
> above)

Actually, I'd rather that the *commit* updated the WC revision level,
if it made sense. The trival case is that the revision of the committed
files is exactly 1 greater than that of the rest of the WC.

But I'm not really even arguing for that. My point was that for ex-CVS
users, the whole concept of a commit causing the WC to be "out-of-date"
is, let us say, unusual. From the SVN "repository versions, not file
versions" point-of-view, it's consistent, if not always convenient.


"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask
about Exchange Server next.
                           -- (Stolen from the net)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 5 18:54:05 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.