Re: Vendor branches

        In the 1.1 documentation on vendor branches it states that one should extract vendor branch 1.1 on top of 1.0
and then run the svn status on it. Right?

Gili

On 28 Nov 2004 13:43:43 -0600, kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>"Gili" <junk@bbs.darktech.org> writes:
>> The documentation on vendor branches suggests that when
>> upgrading from revision 1.0 to 1.1 you should simply expand version
>> 1.1 on top of 1.0 and any unversioned files means that the files were
>> removed in 1.1. I don't understand how I'm supposed to see unversioned
>> files if they were removed in 1.1. I mean, the (1.0) files are still
>> there. I'd expect to see unchanged files. Ideally I'd like to remove
>> all files in 1.0 *except* the svn directories, then expand 1.1 on top
>> of it and then do a status command. Is there an easy way to do that?

>What documentation are you looking at?

>Are you talking about Subversion 1.0 and 1.1? I'm not sure what
>you're reading, but I don't see any reason to unpack one tree on top
>of the other. There's no reason to mix them.

>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 28 20:55:46 2004