[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn and berkeley db corruption revisited

From: Chris Rose <offby1_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2004-11-28 17:42:41 CET

I'm starting to get the impression that the BDB format is not really
so much the way to go -- is there a consensus developing on the
subject? Would it be worth the hassle of doing a dump/restore and
changing to an fs-type for it?

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:12:35 -0500, John Szakmeister
<john@szakmeister.net> wrote:
> Gili wrote:
> >
> > I've already created a repository without using --fs-type. It doesn't
> > seem to indicate what the default is. Any ideas?
>
> Currently, if SVN is built with support for both, it defaults to BDB. I
> expect that to change at some point in the future.
>
>
>
> -John
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>

-- 
Chris R.
======
Not to be taken literally, internally, or seriously.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Nov 28 17:44:58 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.