[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Recovering text-base

From: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2004-11-26 02:11:04 CET

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:43:59 +1100, Chris Jensen <cjensen@edex.com.au> wrote:
> > I suppose this is where systems like Bitkeeper and Arch have an advantage -
> > each user can have a private repository (which can be backed up) where they
> > can keep all their changes until they are ready to push them to the rest of
> > the team. I might encourage people to try SVK if we do move to Subversion.
>
> What's the difference between a private repository in Bitkeeper/Arch and
> a branch in subversion?

The private repository needs only read access to the public repository
it's based on. This means anyone can make one, even if they don't have
commit access. Additionally, usually it's possible to use the private
repository even when the public one is inaccessible (say, because of a
lack of network connectivity)

-- 
bd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 26 02:13:07 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.