On Nov 23, 2004, at 7:30 AM, Chris Rose wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:25:40 -0700, Kevin Williams
> <kevin@bantamtech.com> wrote:
>>>> You might try http://tmate.org/svn/.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is that actually functional now? And if so, has it undergone
>>> extensive
>>> compatibility testing (since it's a complete reimplementation of svn
>>> functionality?) I was under the impression that it was still a work
>>> in
>>> progress.
>>
>> I'm not involved in the project, but it is definitely under heavy
>> development. I believe (could be wrong) that the developer is using it
>> as his svn client - self-hosting, so to speak.
>
> The problem is, so is subversion, and if the core project continues to
> break backwards compatibility with each point release (okay, I
> exaggerate slightly when referring to the client side)
"Break backwards compatibility"? Are you referring to subversion
itself? If so, please be specific. There should be no compatibility
problems moving forwards and backwards between any subversion 1.X
release and 1.y release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 23 17:09:27 2004