G'day Ben,
Apropos of nothing, but there are some definite advantages to a 100%
Java implementation. JNI is really quite a pain in the bottom,
particularly in the context of web applications, where a single JVM is
often responsible for serving multiple "chinese walled" applications
(JNI being a "JVM global" construct and all).
Cheers,
Peter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Monks http://www.sydneyclimbing.com/
pmonks_at_sydneyclimbing.com http://www.geocities.com/yosemite/4455/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Collins-Sussman [mailto:sussman@collab.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 8:22am
> To: Kevin Williams
> Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Using subversion from Java
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2004, at 8:42 AM, Kevin Williams wrote:
>
> > You might try http://tmate.org/svn/.
>
> Is that actually functional now? And if so, has it undergone
> extensive
> compatibility testing (since it's a complete reimplementation of svn
> functionality?) I was under the impression that it was still
> a work in
> progress.
>
> JavaHL, I know, is already functional and used by a number of
> projects.
> And it's guaranteed compatible, since it's using JNI to
> call the svn C
> API.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 22 17:39:49 2004