RE: Re: svn versus cvs

Hi,

Supposedly it did but I haven't verified the timings.

I do think that you should update both your client and your server to see the speedup; upgrading should be painless though and you should be able to update your client and servers independantly (and order shouldn't matter either).

I didn't experience any problem mixing 1.0.x clients / servers and 1.1.x clients / servers.

cheers,

--Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch@stats.uwo.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:51 PM
To: Dave Neary
Cc: Natalya Smirnov; users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: svn versus cvs

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:51:41 +0100, Dave Neary <david@phenix.fr>
wrote:

>Natalya Smirnov wrote:
>> Is SVN faster than CVS in terms of commits, checkout/ins...?
>
>No, but it's not much slower (that wasn't always the case) - in most
>cases you won't notice the difference. You chose the two operations
>which are slower though (check out/in).

I haven't updated to 1.1 yet, but one operation where svn is *much*
slower in 1.07 is "svn blame" (corresponding to "cvs annotate"). On a
project that's sitting at revision 32000 or so, it just isn't worth
waiting for that to complete: I suspect it's doing a linear search
through all the revisions.

I've seen somewhere that there were plans to improve this; did it
happen in 1.1?

Duncan Murdoch

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 16 12:57:56 2004