[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: postgresql project considering svn

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-11-05 20:58:35 CET

Travis P <svn@castle.fastmail.fm> writes:
> This is the real Issue for one of the primary developers and
> commiters, Tom Lane:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-11/msg00183.php
> Summary: he's never lost data with CVS and does not have the same
> confidence in the alternatives

This is fair. CVS is more mature than Subversion. Of course, they
should make regular backups and all that, but we know how often that
really happens :-)...

> This message gives you an idea how the thread started (Tom Lane didn't
> want to move a file and lose history):
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-11/msg00135.php
> (and look at Tom's follow-up)

Thanks for the links!


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 5 22:53:12 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.