RE: CVS/SVN comparison

> From: John Szakmeister [mailto:john@szakmeister.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 11:48 AM

Guido Anzuoni wrote:
[snip]
>
>> I agree, it would be great if mod_authz_svn could be shared among
>> different access methods (together with some extensions on available
>> actions, i.e. read/write is not sufficient, and path specification,
>> i.e. wildcard are appreciated).

> A pre-commit hook can be used, and will work for all access methods.
> That's not to say that the finer-grained access controls wouldn't be nice.
> Just that this concept of having tags that can't be updated can be enforced
> through a pre-commit hook.

Exactly.

What people should also realize is that mod_authz_svn was meant to be
an intermediate solution. Once we have ACLs in the fs layer mod_authz_svn
can go away. For now it does the job well enough to not expand it any
further IMHO. That energy is better spent on fs ACLs.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 25 13:00:10 2004