Re: Re: CVS/SVN comparison

From: Patrick Dean Rusk <PRusk_at_foliage.com>
Date: 2004-10-24 20:29:11 CEST

"Monks, Peter" <peter.monks@vignette.com> wrote...
> AFAICT the only point Peter has made is that this notion is different...
>
> I agree. But AFAICT neither of these facilities is incompatible with...
>
> 1. IMVHO they're little more than minor irritations - certainly not...

ITTYSLUOTUOA.

PDR

;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 24 20:30:26 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Faheem Mitha: "Re: Subversion 1.1.1 released."
Previous message: Branko Čibej: "Re: Subversion 1.1.1 released."
In reply to: Monks, Peter: "RE: Re: CVS/SVN comparison"
Next in thread: HAND,Nathan: "RE: Re: CVS/SVN comparison"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]