Re: CVS/SVN comparison

On Oct 24, 2004, at 01:40, Scott Palmer wrote:

>
> I have no problem with the implementation of tags as cheap copies,
> but the interface could be improved out-of-the-box if subversion had
> built-in support for read-only copies and the link between the copy
> and the original was more obvious. A history of the trunk should show
> when tags were made and what the paths to those copies are, if it
> doesn't then the trunk really isn't tagged is it?

I didn't read this bit in my last reply, sorry.

I totally agree with these points but they need to be fixed in a way
that doesn't confuse subversion's conceptual model.

>
> Scott
> (I really will stop posting to this thread eventually)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>

--
Jeremy Pereira
http://www.jeremyp.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org