[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re[2]: CVS/SVN comparison

From: Bulgrien, Kevin <Kevin.Bulgrien_at_TriPointGlobal.com>
Date: 2004-10-22 17:31:49 CEST

Ok, thanks... SVN newbie ignorance on my part then. Have been watching
the tags with great interest because we make heavy use of tags in our
organization and I am considering whether I want to try to bother
switching over.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David F. Newman [mailto:dnewman@epnet.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 10:25 AM
> To: SVN Users
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: CVS/SVN comparison
>
>
> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 11:14, Bulgrien, Kevin wrote:
> > >
> > > One can force a read-only policy on tags by making the /tags
> > > directory read-only to everyone except the release
> > > coordinator using mod_authz_svn. Then a bad developer can't
> > > change tags.
> >
> > Does this solution also imply that only the release coordinator can
> > branch?
>
> No. I was assuming that one uses the /tags /branches /trunk
> model as described in the book. If one's /branches directory
> is read-write by anyone, then anyone can branch.
>
> -Dave

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 23 05:58:38 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.