[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CVS/SVN comparison

From: Scott Palmer <scott.palmer_at_2connected.org>
Date: 2004-10-22 19:37:46 CEST

On Oct 22, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Patrick Smears wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Scott Palmer wrote:
>
>>> With the setup of the correct authentication, and the correct repo
>>> layout, you can achive tagging.
>>
>> I would argue that even then "Subversion" doesn't support it.. you
>> must
>> use Apache and security settings to work around it. If subversion
>> supported it, then it would work with svn: and file: just as well as
>> http: and https:
>
> It does :-)
>
> The authorisation takes place at the repository hook level - so it
> works
> just as well with any access method.
>

I was under the impression that using svn: the only security was
read-only vs. read-write for the whole repository, and that you could
not apply different security based on the path. So with svn: the
'tags' folder can't be made read-only independently of the trunk and
other 'copies'.

 From the Subversion book:
"Notice that svnserve only understands “blanket” access control. A
user either has universal read/write access, universal read access, or
no access."

So I think my claim still stands.

Note that pre-commit hooks to support this are not provided. If I have
to do my own hook programming it is basically to work around the lack
of the true feature. Otherwise I would just enable the "feature".

Scott

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 22 19:38:22 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.