[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re[2]: CVS/SVN comparison

From: Bulgrien, Kevin <Kevin.Bulgrien_at_TriPointGlobal.com>
Date: 2004-10-22 17:14:56 CEST

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David F. Newman [mailto:dnewman@epnet.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 10:11 AM
> To: SVN Users
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: CVS/SVN comparison
>
>
> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 06:10, pushok wrote:
> > With your approach there NO difference between TAG and
> BRANCH. All
> > that is the COPY. One copy, called TAG we _promise_ do not
> change. And
> > that's why it is a TAG. But nothing can prevent me from
> modifying this
> > COPY. So, some "bad" developer CAN change the TAG.
>
> One can force a read-only policy on tags by making the /tags
> directory read-only to everyone except the release
> coordinator using mod_authz_svn. Then a bad developer can't
> change tags.
>
> -Dave

Does this solution also imply that only the release coordinator
can branch?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 22 17:15:31 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.