[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CVS/SVN comparison

From: Kent Karlsson <kent_at_popwire.com>
Date: 2004-10-14 14:57:05 CEST

Don't forget:

They fail to mention in #1 that the fact everything isn't stored in RCS
files makes it possible to have complete control over directories as
well as files, one of my big issues with CVS.

I like the way they write #8. "However, we have already released a
software product for SVN, so the things are not so bad."

=D

-- kent

On 2004-10-13, at 19.30, Andrew n marshall wrote:

> Searching the web, I came up with this:
> http://www.pushok.com/soft_svn_vscvs.php
> but it is undated. Are the comments provided still accurate?
>
>
> Anm
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

  • application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thu Oct 14 14:59:40 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.