"Scott Palmer" wrote:
> > This is one instance where the concept of a 'label'
> > which marks a prticular sub-tree at a particular revision
> > would actually be useful, provided that a dump/load cycle
> > updates it to the correct position. Maybe merge tracking
> > and labels are related and could be introduced together.
>
> I think the cheap-copy 'tag' still works for this.
Yes it does of course, and I don't want to re-open the long thread on tags
vs labels. The point I failed to make was that merge tracking is on the SVN
roadmap; user-defined labels are not. _If_ the implementation of merge
tracking uses something like a label (and I don't know if this will be the
case), then the user labels that some people have been requesting might drop
out for (almost) free.
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 8 09:53:02 2004