RE: Very slow browsing from SVN 1.1[Scanned]

That's a pitty - I'm really impressed with the speed of 1.1 and fsfs. Much more snappy than 1.0.6 and bdb (don't know which is the causal factor).
 
I guess other improvements in the win32-win32 comms have cancelled out any speed reductions inherent in fsfs? (isn't is supposed to be slightly slower?)
 
It's just really sad it was released with this 'issue'.
 
John
 
==========
 
> Can I ask that it be done as soon as possible?? I know people stress
> about the speed of SVN, and having something like this isn't good for
> your PR!

Bad PR? Yup! My group of testers just rejected SVN as a SCM
replacement candidate because of two major reasons: lack of file
locking, and poor performance.

Oh well.
Received on Mon Oct 4 18:52:02 2004