OK,
I hope these are the last words on topic (just because it gets solved !).
I post a message yesterday stating that repos browsing with TSVN 1.1.0 against
a Subversion 1.1.0 server was a bullet.
Well, it was not really true.
When I made my check I still had a 1.1.0rc1 server runnig.
Then I upgraded to 1.1.0 final and everyone knows everything.
I have just reinstalled 1.1.0rc1 on Windows server and it is really, really ***fast***.
If I use TSVN 1.0.6 to browse the repos it is again slow.
So the conclusion should be:
1. Nagle alg. in neon negatively affects performances (client-side)
2. 1.1.0rc4 introduced something that slowdown on server-side.
Guido.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:ehuels@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 4:46 PM
> To: Guido Anzuoni
> Cc: Jay Glanville; JS.staff; users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: More on slow browsing from SVN 1.1
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 13:43:57 +0200, Guido Anzuoni
> <guido.anzuoni@kyneste.com> wrote:
> > TSVN 1.1 has a specific neon config.hw file that fixes the problem.
> > In fact, TSVN is extremely fast browsing repos, wrt 1.0.x.
> > But, on large directories, TSVN is still slow (and svn
> client even worse).
> > I have verified the same behaviour even with a Linux Apache
> proxy iterposed between
> > the Windows machine, that exhibited better performances
> with previous versions of
> > TSVN (btw, svn client still performs better in this conf).
> > I am going to be a little confused.....
>
> The specific problem you see with 'svn ls' is not a TSVN or Neon
> problem, but one in the security fixes to mod_dav_svn in RC4. We did
> not want to delay 1.1 any longer, but a fix was committed recently to
> trunk and is currently up for voting into 1.1.1.
>
> HTH,
>
> bye,
>
> Erik.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 4 17:18:03 2004