Yes, absolutely true.
Even svn log is rather fast.
More, there is no visible difference between svn ls <path> and
svn -v ls <path>.
Guido.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JS.staff [mailto:jsparrow@ecclescollege.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 1:53 PM
> To: users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: RE: More on slow browsing from SVN 1.1[Scanned]
>
>
> The weird thing is, my problems only seem to relate to TSVN Browsing,
> and 'svn list' commands.
>
> Checkout, for example, is very quick.
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guido Anzuoni [mailto:guido.anzuoni@kyneste.com]
> Sent: 04 October 2004 12:44
> To: Jay Glanville; JS.staff; users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: RE: More on slow browsing from SVN 1.1[Scanned]
>
>
> TSVN 1.1 has a specific neon config.hw file that fixes the problem. In
> fact, TSVN is extremely fast browsing repos, wrt 1.0.x. But, on large
> directories, TSVN is still slow (and svn client even worse). I have
> verified the same behaviour even with a Linux Apache proxy iterposed
> between the Windows machine, that exhibited better performances with
> previous versions of TSVN (btw, svn client still performs
> better in this
> conf). I am going to be a little confused.....
>
> Guido.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jay Glanville [mailto:jay.glanville@naturalconvergence.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 12:50 PM
> > To: 'JS.staff'; users@subversion.tigris.org
> > Subject: RE: More on slow browsing from SVN 1.1
> >
> >
> > I believe it's got to do with Neon's Nagle algorithm.
> >
> > The variables to meet the condition are:
> > - using HTTP protocol
> > - both client and server win machines
> > - is NOT specific to TSVN
> >
> > We've noticed this slowdown in our evaluation of SVN too.
> >
> > Basically, change to the SVN protocol, and you shouldn't
> see a problem
>
> > any more. Or change the OS of either the client or server.
> >
> > This is a known issue, and it was a known issue before the
> release of
> > 1.1. Why it wasn't fixed for 1.1? You'll have to ask the dev list
> > (could have been timing, could have been lack of resources for
> > testing, etc, etc, etc). To fix it, SVN simply has to change a
> > configuration parameter for the Neon libraries.
> >
> > You'll have to do some searches on both the TSVN and the
> user and dev
> > SVN lists for a better explanation. Hope this much of an
> explanation
> > has helped.
> >
> > JDG
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jay Glanville
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: JS.staff [mailto:jsparrow@ecclescollege.ac.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 6:10 AM
> > To: users@subversion.tigris.org
> > Subject: More on slow browsing from SVN 1.1
> >
> >
> > Looks like it's not a TSVN problem. Doing
> >
> > svn list http://.....
> >
> > Is also very slow. When the results appear (10 mins later),
> they come
> > quickly all at once, not slowly line-by-line.
> >
> > The server remains responsive to other requests during this time.
> >
> > I can browse large folders via the web and that's lightening fast.
> >
> > The problem is also noticable on folders with 50-100 items,
> > takes about
> > 30 seconds for them to appear.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 4 14:09:57 2004