-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 27, 2004, at 3:44 PM, Tom Mornini wrote:
> Others would say that keeping the feature set minimalist, and
> not cluttering it with useful, though technically arbitrary
> 'fixes' (which some may classify as crutches for some people's
> inability or unwillingness to adopt to a new conceptual model)
> may, over time, destroy both the technical and conceptual
> cleanliness of an inherently more powerful model.
>
> I believe what would, in fact, be most useful and most clean,
> would be mnemonic name both ADDRESS and REVISION. This could
> perhaps be very similar to svn:externals, with the inclusion
> of revision number. svn:internal anyone?
Out of curiosity, does this provide any functionality that isn't
provided by using copies and 'svn switch'. I agree that it might be
conceptually easier for some users (personally, I find it more
complicated), but like the other "technically arbitrary fixes", I don't
think this actually adds anything functionally to Subversion.
- -Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBWH6SSwe0AHUdEwQRAuHFAJ9RxWWMpFUfol7YBxyjoLYvl4crMACgjBeD
9EHGcRRl9Y1aCIMhgYEx3tk=
=QZ/X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 27 22:57:19 2004