[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "svn log -v" vs. "svnlook changed"

From: Max Bowsher <maxb_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2004-09-21 14:49:39 CEST

Ray Johnson wrote:
> Uh - that's kind of funny... If you read the thread, the issue was that
> "svnlook changed" returns *better* information than "svn log -v". That
> is 1) you can tell if a change was to a property or a file & 2) you can
> tell if a given path is a directory or a file. Svnlook tells you that
> info "svn log -v" does not.
> So clearly changing the name of the executable DOES change things! :)
> Why is a schema change required to fix "svn log"? Just doesn't make a
> lot of sense that svnlook can return this information correctly and svn
> log -v can not - and your condescending dismissal certainly doesn't
> clear it up...

/me ignores the sizzling of incipient flames

A schema change is required to make the showing of node-kind info acceptable

Performance is more important for svn, than svnlook, since svnlook can only
be used locally, and is mainly targeted at repository administrators.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 21 14:50:41 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.