[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: "svn log -v" vs. "svnlook changed"

From: Ray Johnson <Rayj_at_ingenio.com>
Date: 2004-09-20 21:15:43 CEST

Shoot - the bug indicates that because a schema change would be required
this will not happen before 2.0.

What about supporting URLs in the svnlook command? Is that something
that could be done sooner?


-----Original Message-----
From: cmpilato@localhost.localdomain
[mailto:cmpilato@localhost.localdomain] On Behalf Of C. Michael Pilato
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 12:04 PM
To: Ray Johnson
Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: "svn log -v" vs. "svnlook changed"

"Ray Johnson" <Rayj@ingenio.com> writes:

> I'm creating a repository browser for Subversion - which currently
> uses command line calls to "svn" to do all the work. It's works
> pretty well (I plan to make it public/open source sometime soon.)
> I have one issue though which trying to view a "revision". The
> problem I have is with what is returned from "svn log -v". There is
> really some missing information in the "paths" section. For example:
> 1) Directories do not end in a "/" like in "svn log". Which makes it
> impossible (without additional calls) to determine which changes are
> to directories.

Issue #1967.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 20 21:15:56 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.