[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Broken behavior?

From: Max Bowsher <maxb_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2004-09-17 19:14:01 CEST

Dewey M. Sasser wrote:
> Long time CVS user/short time svn user.
>
> One of my historical assertions about SCM systems it that it should
> support an "always valid" working model, meaning that it should be
> possible to maintain the repository in an always valid state.
>
> In subversion (1.0.5 on cygwin and 1.0.6 on Gentoo Linux) it is not
> possible to "rename" something properly if the target is under svn
> control.
>
> In other words, if I have two items A and B, both under svn control
> and I would like to get rid of B and rename A to B, I assert that I
> should:
>
> 1) svn rm B
> 2) svn cp A B
>
> This preserves change history and the semantics of my actions. Svn
> reports an error when I attempt this.
>
> Attached is a script to illustrate this problem.
>
> Should I write this up in the issue tracker as a feature request?

No.

Because it's already there.

Issue 1516

Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 17 19:15:12 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.