[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Experience with FSFS repository

From: Michael W Thelen <thelenm_at_cs.utah.edu>
Date: 2004-09-17 18:48:11 CEST

Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
>>"Martin Tomes" <lists@tomes.org> wrote...
>>We use BDB and it has *never* got wedged and there is little reason why it
>>should if you set up the
>>server correctly.
> ...
> On the other hand, I'm not surprised at problems arising when people convert
> large VSS or CVS repositories to SVN. It's always struck me as a fool's
> errand to do so, but I guess it's important to some people to not have to go
> to another tool to see history on a file.

Just another data point: my company switched to Subversion from CVS
about four months ago, with a trial period beginning a few months before
that. We converted four years of CVS history with cvs2svn. Our
repository has almost 33,000 revisions, with an average of about 50
commits per day from about 20 committers. We've never had a problem
with a wedged repository.

-- Mike

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 17 18:49:37 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.