[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: request for help with subversion 1.1.0-rc2 Debian packages

From: Faheem Mitha <faheem_at_email.unc.edu>
Date: 2004-08-27 17:57:55 CEST

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Greg Hudson wrote:

>> 2) I think it would be a good idea if packages of subversion without
>> the BDB dependency could be created.
>> Would different versions of all the Debian packages have to be
>> created in that case? Ie. libapache2-svn, python2.3-subversion,
>> subversion, libsvn0, subversion, libsvn0-dev, subversion,
>> subversion-tools, libsvn-core-perl.
> Not necessarily. If you build with --enable-dso (so that the RA and
> FS modules are loaded dynamically at runtime) and put the RA and FS
> modules in separate packages, the main package need not depend on
> anything beyond apr and apr-util.
> It doesn't look like David is currently doing things this way, though.

Yes, but would that make it possible to have a set of packages which
offered only fsfs support without requiring a dependency on BDB? Did you
have in mind two fs packages, one for fsfs and the other for BDB?

Any idea about the main packaging question? Thanks for replying.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 27 17:58:26 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.