[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Automatic pretty-print

From: Erik Anderson <erikba_at_teamworkgroup.com>
Date: 2004-08-19 04:21:53 CEST

If you need something for handling when developers "break the build", you
might look at something like Mozilla Tinderbox (
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tinderbox/ ), which contains logic that
would continously rebuild your application and test every change to ensure
that nobody broke anything...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Suresh Govindachar" <sgovindachar@yahoo.com>
To: <users@subversion.tigris.org>
Cc: "Marmolejo" <zeus22@casal.upc.es>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: Automatic pretty-print

> > Also it would be desirable to check C syntax so all files
> > that are in the repository complile all.
> The preceding remark is very strange because:
> A requirement for checking into a repository that will be
> used by others (in contrast to a repository that is the
> private "working space" of the developer) is that the
> checked-in version not break anything. This requirement
> is much more stringent that merely having the right
> syntax: the developer must work to establish that his
> changes will not break anything before committing his
> file to the repository (and this work is much more than
> mere syntax checking).
> So that remark is very strange indeed.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 19 04:15:23 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.