[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn diff --notice-ancestry: strange behavior

From: Nick Patavalis <npat_at_efault.net>
Date: 2004-08-03 00:57:05 CEST

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:41:45PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 17:36, Nick Patavalis wrote:
> > svn diff --notice-ancestry \
> > --old svn://host/rep/branches/b1/dir1 \
> > --new ./dir1
> My understanding is that 'svn diff --old URL --new working_copy' isn't
> supported at all in the svn 1.0.x line. Are you sure that's working?
> Aren't you getting an error?

You 're right! It seems like diff ignores the "--old" argument
altogether! It behaves as if I was doing just "svn diff ./dir1".

Is there a list of other such "gotchas" posted someplace?


If you want to travel around the world and be invited to speak at a
lot of different places, just write a Unix operating system.
  -- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 3 00:57:33 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.