[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Re: log across copies?

From: Rick LaBanca <rickla1_at_cox.net>
Date: 2004-07-29 22:47:30 CEST

> > I'm not sure why making branches very fast is such a high
> > design priority, it never bothered me since making them
> > is not done all that often. But tags==branches so perhaps
> > that's why but I'm willing to wait for tagging too.
> Speak for yourself... As I just mentioned in another post, we branch for
> *every* change or task. (It has to do with the incredibly paranoid
> we have towards bugs - in our situation, bugs are critically expensive.)

We also make a lot but cvs is plenty fast even though it's not instant.
Instant isn't needed. Yes I am speaking for myself! When I was using
clearcase we branched for each defect since it was so fast, and it gave me
the history I am trying to get here. Sounds like you may have the bodies I
had when using clearcase, but I don't now, so one guy tracing a regression
is all we get!

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 29 22:48:03 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.