Re: Re: log across copies?
From: <rickla1_at_cox.net>
Date: 2004-07-29 22:01:55 CEST
> So no, they're not disconnected at all. The connection is only easily
By this I mean the trunk has a bug in a file. I suspect a change in a line, and I see it between two revs. But inbetween those revs, the file could have been copied to other branches and gone through many revs, and come back. A hole in detail may be a better way to say this.
> Note that this design isn't accidental, nor is it necessarily a design
I was kind of assuming this was the problem. I'm not sure why making branches very fast is such a high design priority, it never bothered me since making them is not done all that often. But tags==branches so perhaps that's why but I'm willing to wait for tagging too.
Even if it's brute force, this is needed. I see comments in that document that forward pointing was thought of I and I really agree with that.
I mean, it's not just the value of a repository that data isn't easily lost and it has a history, but that the data can be audited to see when things went wrong.
We've got branches all over the place, and we often have to find where a piece of code broke. With subversion it's going to be rough. It sounds like the only option I now have is to browse all the branches I can see, and look at the file logs separately.
Plus if in a branch, the filename changes or the file moves, I'm not sure how to even see that foo.c is really the bar.c I was looking for....
I'm new to this but trying to get up to speed fast for answering dev questions as they convert over.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.