[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: sub-versions?

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-07-28 18:56:32 CEST

Jacob Atzen <jacob@aub.dk> writes:
> I'm sorry, I didn't mean to advocate anything. I just wanted to help the
> O.P. make an informed choice as he didn't seem to know the concept of a
> distributed vcs.
>
> Don't get me wrong -- I'm as excited about Subversion as anyone. And as
> svk was already mentioned by another post I found it redundant to
> mention it again (not to mention the fact that I had never heard of svk
> before that post).

You were fine, Jacob -- it's always okay to point someone to Arch if
you think it will help them, even on this list. Brane was just trying
to avoid a descent into the endless (and unresolvable) Arch vs
Subversion thread that consumed so much time a while back.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 28 20:29:03 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.