[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: File system vs. BDB

From: Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org>
Date: 2004-07-16 01:48:50 CEST

Tobias Herp <tobias.herp@gmx.de> writes:

> I read this -- very interesting. To put it short, BDB is more
> suitable for heavily used servers, and fsfs for most other
> situations, right?

In my experience, a heavily used repository has more BDB
problems, not fewer. I'm not convinced the extra time on the
server is a real problem. Certainly all my testing with our
large and heavily accessed repositories shows it not to be a

> Would it be a good idea to start with subversion 1.1.0 and fsfs?

I think so.

Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 16 01:49:11 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.