Re: File system vs. BDB

Tobias Herp <tobias.herp@gmx.de> writes:

> I read this -- very interesting. To put it short, BDB is more
> suitable for heavily used servers, and fsfs for most other
> situations, right?

In my experience, a heavily used repository has more BDB
problems, not fewer. I'm not convinced the extra time on the
server is a real problem. Certainly all my testing with our
large and heavily accessed repositories shows it not to be a
problem.

> Would it be a good idea to start with subversion 1.1.0 and fsfs?

I think so.

--
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 16 01:49:11 2004