[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Subversion 1.1.0 Release Candidate 1 released.

From: Henderson, Michael D <michael.d.henderson_at_lmco.com>
Date: 2004-07-14 22:12:05 CEST

Sort of on the same lines...

The web site states

> Database schema: if upgrading to Subversion 1.1, there is no need
> to dump and load your repository. There will be no changes
> requiring dump/load before Subversion 2.0.

Would a dump/load-type operation ever be needed for the FSFS backend?


-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Matthew A [mailto:Matthew.Campbell@Relizon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:04 PM
To: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: Subversion 1.1.0 Release Candidate 1 released.

> User-visible-changes:
> * new non-database repository back-end (libsvn_fs_fs)

I looked through the release notes and the fsfs advantages/disadvantages
list, but didn't see any mention of the following:

Is there a migration path for those of us who would like to try running
existing repositories in this new format? Should a dump/load cycle work?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 14 22:12:41 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.