Ken Miller wrote:
> I'm in the process of setting up a SVN repository to replace a medium
> sized CVS repository. No major issues yet, and I'm *very* impressed
> with the stability and functionality of Subversion. Kudos to the
> developers for a great tool!
>
> One of the features I'm trying to exploit is the post-commit hook to
> create incremental backups on the fly. Effectively, something like this:
>
> svnadmin dump $1 --revision $2 --incremental >> date-stamped-file
>
> I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1. Does SVN enforce the running order of post-commit hooks in revision
> number sequence? If two developers commit changes to the repository
> creating revisions 1 and 2 respectively, does SVN *always* run the
> post-commit hook for revision 1, and then for revision 2?
I hate answering my own questions, but I may as well for posterity :-)
The answer to #1 is no, Subversion does not enforce revision number
sequencing of the execution of post-commit hooks.
> 2. When restoring a Subversion repository, does the backup file need
> to be in revision number order? Or, put a different way, does the
> restore process the restore in revision number order or file order?
> If subversion processes the file in revision number order, then #1 is
> not an issue.
I'm still investigating this one...
-klm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 13 18:11:08 2004