[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Merge & blame

From: Campbell, Matthew A <Matthew.Campbell_at_Relizon.com>
Date: 2004-07-02 21:45:55 CEST

In our repository, there are two access groups; admins and developers.
Production code (/trunk) is readable to all, but only writable to admins.
Most (if not all) development changes are actually executed in /branches by
people in the developers group.

Using svn merge to integrate changes into the trunk is the obvious method,
however:
1) All incremental commits to the branch are lost
2) "blame" ownership gets changed to the person doing the merge - the admin
user

Is there any way around this? "switch" looked promising, until I watched it
delete some newly-created files. :(

Is this related to the lack of "merge tracking" I'm reading about in other
threads? If so, then I'm encouraged by the fact that it's on the to-do
list, and am curious as to which version of SVN for which this is likely to
be implemented.

TIA...

--------------------------------------------------------
Matt Campbell, Programmer Analyst
The Relizon Company (Timonium, MD)
Tel: 410-308-7059 Fax: 410-561-8237

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 2 21:55:23 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.