Re: commit allowed without update first?

On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 15:49, Jacques Carette wrote:
> It has happened to me twice now that my changes were overwritten by a
> colleague (we edited in parallel, I committed first, he commits second yet
> is not forced to either update or merge).
>
> The subversion server and my colleague are both using a Linux flavor, but I
> use TortoiseSVN [which should not matter at all, since the changes were
> clearly recorded in the logs as being committed, seperated by at least 15
> minutes of time].
>
> I thought that this was never supposed to happen?!

It cannot happen. You'll need to show us details to make us believe
you. :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 10 14:29:20 2004