Concerning Re: --dry-run
Glenn Maynard wrote on 14 Apr 2004, 4:43, at least in part:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 10:27:41AM +0200, Jan Hendrik wrote:
> Just the tuppence by a low-power user without any CVS
> inheritance and neither implying nor urging for something that has
> huge effects over the code:
>
> However, I would see it simply as a question of logical consistency
> to have the same switch (--dry-run) available on all commands
> where it makes sense. Just as --revision or --recursive or the like.
> But I would not see an 'update --dry-run' just from the point that it
> copies CVS behavior where the intentional separating into two
> commands created something more comfortable and powerful for
> other tasks.
You sent this to me, not the mailing list; you probably didn't mean
to
do that ...
Oh, sure ... Sorry, Glenn. Don't have a copy though, so forwarding
this, though now a little out of context.
Jan Hendrik
---------------------------------------
Freedom quote:
It is not my intention to do away with government.
It is rather to make it work -- work with us, not over us;
stand by our side, not ride on our back.
Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it;
foster productivity, not stifle it.
-- Ronald Reagan,
First Inaugural Address, January 20, 1981
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 14 16:18:25 2004