On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:39, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:31, Jan Hendrik wrote:
>
> > Second attempt, now with experimental build (thanks, Ben) svn-
> > win32-1.1-dev-9226.zip and commit succeeded, using a maximum
> > of 14 MB of memory!
>
> Hm, I don't think r9032 (which I presume is the fix on /trunk which has
> solved the problem) has been backported to the 1.0.x branch. Perhaps it
> should be a 1.0.2 candidate? It looks like it could seriously affect
> tortoisesvn users...
Hm, now I wonder. r9032 specifically fixed a runaway memory bug
whenever 'svn up' tried to delete many things. But Jan's memory bug was
about commits. So it must be some *other* memory-fix to /trunk that's
at work here. Anyone know which one that is? That's the one we should
backport.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 8 18:24:08 2004