Determining origin of branch
From: <pceteaudatmacif.fr_at_netcourrier.com>
Date: 2004-03-26 16:22:12 CET
What I reproach to CVS, is that you cannot have a clear view of branches or versions.
Finaly, you must keep this kind of information outside of CVS, or keep it in the name of the versions and branches. It means you cannot let everyone make versions or branches when he likes the way he likes.
I thought innocently, it was the kind of stuff a SCM should do.
When I heard about SubVersion, it was the first thing I looked for.
Answer is "Brute force search at the moment" and "no definite plans yet" are the answers
:-(
I'm not saying CVS does not a good job. It has solved a lot of our problems.
Of course, the work made to deliver version 1.0.0 of Subversion was a great job, and Subversion has the time to become a mature product.
I just expose what improvement is the more important to me. I know there is a lot of important other thing to develop.
So continue, I'll keep a eye on the next releases
Pierre
>Yup. Brute force search at the moment. This is the "dark side" of
-------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.