Re: FW: Subversion 1.0.1 Win32 version

On Thursday 25 March 2004 19.43, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Jostein Chr. Andersen [mailto:jostein@josander.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:57 PM
> >
> > On Thursday 25 March 2004 16.57, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > ... and Sander *did* get his whole svn tree to compile, apache
> > > modules and all. He sent me a 1.0.1 zipfile that looks just like
> > > branko's 1.0.0 zipfile. But when I run Sander's binary, I get
> > > errors about MSVCR70.dll not being found in %PATH%. Ugh.
> >
> > Please, compile it with VC6. VC6 and VC7 are using different runtime
> > files and the installer is made with VC6 in mind.
>
> I really don't feel like 'downgrading' my compiler here. For me it's
> doing it with VC7 or not doing it at all.
>
> > If you use VC7, then the installer must be changed to include the
> > runtime files for VC7.
>
> A single merge file, containing a single dll, AFAIK.

Yes, msvcr70.dll (which is allowed to be (and should be) included with
the zip files) is the only addition AFAIK.

VC6 needs MSVCRT.dll wich is included in almost every target machine. The
installer takes care of this if it's missing. So..

..it turns up that VC7 is not a problem after all (as long as I know wich
VC who compiled the packege and that msvcr70.dll is included in the zip
if VC7).

> > I can make an ordinary #ifdef system for the installer
> > (depending on VC6 vs. VC7 runtimes if wanted, it's not a big job)
> > and should be safe to merge to the 1.0.x branch. This problems is
> > non excistant if you use VC6.
>
> Same goes for any box .net is installed on, no?

I do only have VC5 so I don't know. But I guess that the answer is yes.

Jostein

-- 
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org