[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Thanks and a global versioning question; WAS:: Help: XML Pars er e rror, Date Conversion failed

From: Tom Vergote <tom_at_tomvergote.be>
Date: 2004-03-23 21:27:16 CET

On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 21:13, Crucius, Wesley wrote:
> Well, at least I'm not [completely] crazy... Although, I don't like the
> fact that I'd have to maintain/administer multiple repositories and that it
> would break the "External Definitions" and "Vendor Branches" capabilities, I
> think... Also, if using svnserve, it's not possible to run multiple
> repositories (instances of svnserve) on a single server, is it? Well, unless
> I bind each instance to a different port number, which seems hokey. It's
> cerainly not a show stopper for me if I have to run Apache, but setting up
> svnserve certainly is simple in comparison. Am I correct to assume that
> using Apache would make it possible to have multiple repositories without
> having apache listening on multiple ports?

Not really i think

Running svnserve -d -r c:\reporoot\ works just fine if under reporoot
you have a structure with subdirectorys (and repository's) per project.

The -r only restricts as far as i understood and you can still access
each different repo with svn://hostname/projectname if each project is a
repository of its own

You're right about administering users though
>
> Wes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Vergote [mailto:tom@tomvergote.be]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 2:02 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Thanks and a global versioning question; WAS:: Help: XML Parser
> e rror, Date Conversion failed
>
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 20:26, Crucius, Wesley wrote:
> > [snip]
> > My proposed users aren't going to like (or
> > understand) the global revision number
> I'm facing the same problem and that's why i'm considering a repository per
> project, "the project gets a new revision every time someone commits" seems
> easier than "something in the repository got committed so everything has a
> new revision now, and thats why that project jumped to rev 317 even though
> it's still only a html design"
> > [snip]
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Wes Crucius
>
> >
>

Received on Tue Mar 23 21:26:09 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.