Re: SVN install on Fedora Core?

On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 07:01:00AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i haven't tried to install off of that repo, so i'm interested in anyone
> else's experience. is apr-0.9.5 a true dependency or not? the hiwaay
> repo seems to suggest not, so now i'm truly confused. but that's mostly
> because there's only decaf around here this morning.

No, Subversion 1.0 does not really require APR 0.9.5 (which doesn't
really exist yet).

The configure scripts fails with 0.9.4 to prevent people using the
*snapshot* of 0.9.4 which was bundled with httpd 2.0.47, but it's easy
enough to work around that. I'm not aware of any technical reason why
Subversion 1.0 can't be built against the httpd 2.0.48 and apr 0.9.4
packages included in FC1 and updates.

It looks like David's db42 RPMs are not built using --with-uniquename:
this is really pretty dangerous since you'll end up with both the DB 4.1
and 4.2 libraries linked into the httpd process if you use
PHP/mod_perl/etc, and the symbols will collide.

Regards,

joe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 23 15:45:55 2004