Kay,
I did read the book. It offers nothing for situations like ours. We can't
allow two programmers to change the same Filemaker file at the same time.
There is no way to track their changes. They may have moved a text label 2
pixels to the left, scaled a graphic, or deleted 20 layouts, each with many
fields, and dozens of graphics, and so on.
Until SVN offers check-out/check-in facilities it is quite useless for this
kind of work.
Pity.
Anyone know if check-in/check-out will definately be in version 1.1?
Any word on when a 1.1 beta with that in it may be released?
Thanks,
Terry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kay Abendroth" <abendroth@wsc-gmbh.de>
To: <users@subversion.tigris.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: is subversion useful for mainly binary projects?
>
>
> Kevin Williams wrote:
> > You might want to read the Subversion book section on resolving
> > conflicts
> > (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/html-chunk/ch03s05.html#svn-ch-3-sect-4.4)
> > and perhaps try some test files. If the conflict management process that
> > is currently in place still does not work for you, I suggest that you
> > not forget about Subversion. There are rumors of locking being
> > implemented relatively soon, and with that in place there might be no
> [...]
>
> For the 'Locking'-issue see
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1478
>
>
> Kay
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 18 21:28:23 2004