[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bad access methods (was: 100% repeatable repo wedging)

From: Matthew Gregan <kinetik_at_orcon.net.nz>
Date: 2004-03-04 22:51:03 CET

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 04:22:27PM -0500, Jim Nutt wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:12:29 +1300
> Matthew Gregan <kinetik@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

> > So spend an extra five minutes during the initial svnserve
> > configuration and wrap svnserve up with stunnel. I can write up and
> > post some documentation on how to do this if anybody would find it
> > useful.

> And spend the next week trying to get network ops to open yet another
> port through the firewall? I don't think so.

It was a solution to your "svnserve sans ssh isn't secure" comment.
Obviously it's not a solution for everyone-but if the reason _you_ can't
use that particular solution is because of company policy, why even
argue the point with me?

-mjg

-- 
Matthew Gregan                     |/
                                  /|                kinetik@orcon.net.nz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 4 22:49:46 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.