[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bad access methods (was: 100% repeatable repo wedging)

From: Matthew Gregan <kinetik_at_orcon.net.nz>
Date: 2004-03-04 22:12:29 CET

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 03:56:41PM -0500, Jim Nutt wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:40:49 -0500
> Brian Mathis <bmathis@directedge.com> wrote:

> > This brings me to the question of why are you using svn+ssh? Out of
> > the 4 access methods you have to choose from, you've chosen (IMO), the
> > 3rd most desirable one. They are, in order of desireability:
> > 1. http
> > 2. svnserve daemon
> > 3. svn+ssh
> > 4. file

> That's easy. Security. svnserve sans ssh isn't secure. https is, or
> can be, anyway, but it's not always an option.

So spend an extra five minutes during the initial svnserve configuration
and wrap svnserve up with stunnel. I can write up and post some
documentation on how to do this if anybody would find it useful.

-mjg

-- 
Matthew Gregan                     |/
                                  /|                kinetik@orcon.net.nz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 4 22:11:30 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.