when I tried this I noticed:
checking checking for Berkeley DB 2 in /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2...
checking db2/db.h usability... yes
checking db2/db.h presence... yes
checking for db2/db.h... yes
checking for db_open in -ldb2... yes
setting APRUTIL_INCLUDES to "-I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2/include"
setting APRUTIL_LDFLAGS to "-L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2/lib"
checking for Berkeley DB... found db2
Should this worry me? It doesn't seem to be recognizing it as BDB 4.2 ...
also ... Apache's make fails after this, so what else needs to happen for
this to work?
cheers
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Hoffman [mailto:jason@jasonhoffman.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:16 PM
> To: users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: problem configuring subversion (berkeley db)
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Subversion's ./configure --with-berkely-db=/usr/local/db42 found the
> 4.2 libraries once I symbolically linked (libdb-4.2.a libdb-4.2.so
> libdb-4.2.la) them to libdb.a libdb.so libdb.la.
>
> Bests, Jason
>
> On Feb 25, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Thomas Braun wrote:
>
> > hmm... berkeley db 4.1 seems to work.
> > but i relly don't want to have an unstable versioning system.
> >
> > in the mailing lists i did not find any instruction for installing
> > 4.2. could you specify some direkt links to get me started?
> >
> > thanks
> > Thomas
> >
> > Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 25 23:50:42 2004